BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//The Brussels Institute for Advanced Studies - ECPv6.17.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://brias.be
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for The Brussels Institute for Advanced Studies
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Brussels
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260203T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260203T150000
DTSTAMP:20260204T095836Z
CREATED:20251209T081635Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260204T095836Z
UID:2524-1770123600-1770130800@brias.be
SUMMARY:Thursday Seminars by Gefjon Off
DESCRIPTION:Young men’s and women’s gender equality attitudes – a Gen Z gender divide?\nBio\nGefjon Off is a postdoctoral researcher at Hamburg University. Previously\, she was a postdoctoral researcher at Leuphana University of Lüneburg and a PhD student at Gothenburg University. Her research takes a comparative approach to the study of gender and political behavior. It is published in form of a Cambridge Element\, and as journal articles in the European Journal of Political Research and West European Politics\, amongst others. 
URL:https://brias.be/event/thursday-seminars-by-gefjon-off/
LOCATION:BrIAS\, Boulevard Général Jacques 210\, Ixelles\, Brussels\, 1050\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:Programme Events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260212T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260212T150000
DTSTAMP:20260205T093127Z
CREATED:20251209T081803Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260205T093127Z
UID:2526-1770897600-1770908400@brias.be
SUMMARY:Thursday Seminars by Bruno Castanho Silva and Giulia Fuochi
DESCRIPTION:Second Class: Public Opinion Perceptions of Naturalized Citizens’ Rights and Duties \nBio\nBruno Castanho Silva is an Assistant Professor for Methods in Empirical Social Research at the Institute of Sociology and Otto-Suhr Institute of Political Science at the Free University of Berlin\, Germany. He holds a PhD in Political Science from the Central European University (Budapest\, Hungary) and is also an Executive Board member of the Methods Excellence Initiative (MethodsNET). Bruno’s research uses a variety of quantitative and computational methods to study issues connected to populism and radicalism\, social media and politics\, and the representation of underrepresented groups. His work has been published in journals such as the American Political Science Review\, American Journal of Political Science\, and Political Analysis\, among others.  \nAbstract\nCitizenship has once again become a politicized issue across developed countries\, at the same time as demographic changes lead to higher numbers of dual and naturalized citizens. However\, empirical political research has dedicated little attention to natural-born citizens views’ on those topics. This paper argues that naturalized citizens\, while in theory having (almost) all the legal rights of natural-born ones\, are still seen as second-class citizens in European countries when it comes to their rights\, but are expected to fulfil their whole share of citizenship obligations. It tests these expectations with a survey experiment fielded in four EU countries (n ca. 2\,000 per country)\, in which respondents indicate how much they approve of certain rights and obligations for natural-born or naturalized citizens\, and of long-term non-citizen residents. Findings indicate that the public has less tolerance for naturalized citizens who are critical of the country to vote and participate in politics\, but holds them to the same level of duty as the natural-born when it comes to serving the military in case of foreign threats. These findings shed the first empirical light on the  re-emerging politicized issue of citizenship rights in Europe and beyond.  \n\nDeprovincialization and other pathways to intergroup and societal harmony\nBio\nGiulia Fuochi is assistant professor and researcher in social psychology at the University of Padova. Her work explores how people relate to others across group boundaries\, with a focus on prejudice\, intergroup contact\, mindfulness\, and openness toward diversity. She has published extensively on these topics in international journals.  \nAbstract \nRecent decades have seen a rise in identity-based polarization in several democratic societies\, exacerbating conflict among social groups. One process that may counteract this trend could be that of deprovincialization\, a shift in perspective through which individuals come to view their own group’s norms and values as less absolute or superior\, while becoming more open to and accepting of cultural differences. Deprovincialization typically emerges from positive intergroup contact – i.e.\, interactions between members of different social groups – but also entails a strong component of cognitive change\, transforming how people interpret social diversity and group or national identity. This presentation will first shed light on the concept of deprovincialization\, also illustrating its links with intergroup variables (intergroup contact\, prejudice\, and anxiety)\, socio-political dispositions (right-wing authoritarianism\, social dominance orientation) and other individual tendencies (curiosity\, values) through network analysis. Second\, results from latent profile analysis\, a person-centered approach that identifies latent subgroups of individuals based on similar patterns of responses across variables\, will show how deprovincialization tends to cluster within profiles characterized by cognitive flexibility\, curiosity\, pro-diversity and anti-hierarchy beliefs. Third\, the potential behavioral outcomes of deprovincialization in an experimental setting will be explored: participants exposed to an audio clip designed to elicit deprovincialization – compared to those assigned to an active control condition – reported lower levels of national ingroup identification (i.e.\, Italians)\, and\, more importantly\, stronger intentions to engage in collective action to improve the conditions of the outgroup (i.e.\, Arab people living in Italy). Overall\, these findings highlight deprovincialization as a core mechanism for social change\, fostering openness toward diversity and pluralism\, reducing ethnocentrism\, and mobilizing advantaged groups to support disadvantaged ones. 
URL:https://brias.be/event/thursday-seminars-by-bruno-castanho-silva-and-giulia-fuochi/
LOCATION:BrIAS\, Boulevard Général Jacques 210\, Ixelles\, Brussels\, 1050\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:Programme Events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260219T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260219T150000
DTSTAMP:20260205T093309Z
CREATED:20251209T081950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260205T093309Z
UID:2528-1771502400-1771513200@brias.be
SUMMARY:Thursday Seminars by Franziska Höhne
DESCRIPTION:Stating the obvious? Far-right frames of climate change acceptance in the European Parliament\nAbstract\nIn a rapidly warming world\, climate obstruction has become a central challenge of global governance – exacerbated by the rising influence of far-right actors. Far-right ideology is understood as inherently incompatible with climate policy\, particularly when interpreted through a populist lens. When considered a thin-centred ideology\, the complexity of climate governance clashes with Manichean\, anti- cosmopolitan worldview of the populist far-right.  \nYet\, recent scholarship paints a more nuanced picture. Not only has the European far-right shifted from primary to secondary obstruction\, i.e. from denial to response scepticism\, some parties have also been found to selectively embrace international climate cooperation. This variation remains underexplored.  \nBuilding on research that highlights the role of contextual factors over ideology for far-right stances on climate policy\, this paper compares the impact of domestic factors such as issue salience\, green party strength\, and office opportunities. In a comparative case study design\, the paper analyses justifications provided in MEPs’ speeches and voting records\, supplemented by interviews with far-right MEPs and their staff. Understanding the nuances of far-right climate obstructionism is essential for a comprehensive grasp of the phenomenon and for designing effective responses. \nBio\nFranziska Höhne is a PhD researcher in the field of International Relations\, based at Goethe University Frankfurt\, and is currently affiliated as a visiting researcher at CEVIPOL\, ULB. Her research is situated at the far-right climate nexus\, with a focus on the international institutions intended to govern the climate crisis. For her PhD thesis\, she analyses how far-right parties in Europe approach international climate policy\, what influences their positions and how we can explain variance between the parties. Franziska Höhne obtained a M.Sc. degree in Global Studies from Gothenburg University in 2021 and a B.A. in International Relations from the University of Erfurt in 2019.
URL:https://brias.be/event/thursday-seminars-by-franziska-hohne/
LOCATION:BrIAS\, Boulevard Général Jacques 210\, Ixelles\, Brussels\, 1050\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:Programme Events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260226T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260226T150000
DTSTAMP:20260205T093208Z
CREATED:20251209T082047Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260205T093208Z
UID:2530-1772107200-1772118000@brias.be
SUMMARY:Thursday Seminar by Gaston Meskens
DESCRIPTION:The Possibility of Global Governance\nAn ethics of care for our contemporary coexistence.  \nAbstract\nThe Possibility of Global Governance is a reflective exercise in the applied philosophy of ethics\, and to some extent also in the poetics of ethics. My aim is to present a normative ethics idea open for reflection and discussion\, namely that the possibility of fair and effective global governance should be perceived from out of an ethics of care perspective – caring for human relationships in making sense of the complexity of complex problems – and that this possibility becomes ‘unlocked’ and enabled with the realisation of methods of politics\, science and education that would allow a fair dealing with the complexity that binds us\, inspired and motivated by that ethics of care perspective. These methods can be characterised as deliberative democracy as a collective reflection and learning process\, transdisciplinary and participatory scientific research and policy advice and education for a reflexive cosmopolitanism. \nThe idea is that these advanced methods of democracy\, scientific research and education together do hold that ‘possibility’: they make our global connectedness in complexity ‘visible’ and are at the same time inspired by it; they stimulate our sense of social and political engagement and at the same time make that engagement practically possible; they take into account the vulnerability of the specific roles we take on and assign to each other in society but at the same time provide the possibility to take our responsibility in those roles … Some proposed aspects of this ‘advanced’ method of global governance are realistic or do even exist already today in some fragmented or ‘light’ form or policy ambition\, as it is the case with transdisciplinarity in scientific policy advice or local public participation in decision making. Others are plainly utopian in terms of their possible realisation in the current situation\, like global deliberative democracy or the relativisation of the sovereignty of the nation state in global (international) politics. \nObviously it would be naive to think that a positive narrative of care ethics for global governance could lead directly to concrete changes for the better. One can understand that most protagonists of political power in the politics of today have little desire to enter into dialogue about the justification of their power\, as they see it as legitimised by the traditional political systems in which they operate. The initiative for advanced thinking about global governance will have to come from people who\, in solidarity and inspired and motivated by an ethics of care vision such as the one proposed here\, want to draw closer to engage in dialogue about the workings of politics\, science\, the market and education. The avant-garde of their solidarity lies in their willingness to see our coexistence not as a cynical society of conflict and competition\, but as a society that\, today more than ever\, is characterised by our connectedness in complexity\, by our sense of engagement in reflection and deliberation to give meaning to it\, and by the recognition of the vulnerability of our roles that we assign to each other in the process. The idea of ‘cosmopolitanism as capability’ will be foundational in this vision. Only when we are prepared to reflect on our own position and behaviour ‘in that whole world of concern’ will we be able to see all other people as being of equal moral standing\, simply because then we will not only see them as having equal moral standing in their own right\, but because we can then consider them as also having an equal right to act upon a moral responsibility. \nBio\nGaston Meskens is a ‘philosophical activist’ and artist with a background in science.\nHe holds master’s degrees in theoretical physics and nuclear engineering and a doctoral degree in moral philosophy from the University of Ghent (Belgium). In his philosophical research\, he works part-time with the Science\, Technology and Society research group of the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK CEN and with the Faculty of Arts and Philosophy of Ghent University. At Ghent University\, his research focuses on a human rights perspective related to intellectual capacity building in the interest of global sustainable development governance. At SCK CEN\, his research and outreach is concerned with the ethics of science and technology in general and with the ethical aspects of dealing with nuclear technology in particular.  His Seminars on Ethics of Science and Technology are part of multiple international training programmes and university curricula.\nGaston Meskens has built up more than twenty years of experience in transdisciplinary research related to the ethics of governance of issues such as sustainable development\, energy\, climate change and radioactive waste management and with working in and around the policy processes of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)\, the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD)\, the United Nations Non-Proliferation Treaty process (UN-NPT) and of the research-related activities of the European Commission. Since 2006\, he is member of the steering committee of the Constituency of Research-oriented Independent Non-Governmental Organisations towards the UNFCCC (the constituency that represents the global scientific world in the United Nations Climate Change negotiation process).\nMore info: https://www.normsanddialectics.net/why/
URL:https://brias.be/event/thursday-seminar-by-gaston-meskens/
LOCATION:BrIAS\, Boulevard Général Jacques 210\, Ixelles\, Brussels\, 1050\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:Programme Events
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR